Search

Newsletter

Newsletter February 2008

CORPORATE LITIGATION


Supreme Court: Loyal Investor May Still Receive Extra Reward

According to the Supreme Court, companies may hold out the prospect of extra dividend to shareholders who have registered themselves at the company as long-term investors. The Supreme Court also ruled in this case that the Enterprise Section (Ondernemingskamer, "OK") can only take immediate measures if there are compelling interests, before an investigation is ordered. read more

EMPLOYMENT


No Permanent Appointment of Employee with Chronic Illness is Discriminatory 
An employee works through a temporary employment agency as facilities assistant in the post room of the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration. She suffers from a disorder that causes her recurrent cysts in the groins. In two meetings, her superior promised her that if she performed well she would be recommended for a fixed appointment of one year. But the management did not appoint the employee, the reason for the rejection was connected to her sickness absence. read more

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY


Supreme Court Follows Lidl Judgment in Ruling on Non-Use

In a recent judgment on lapse of a trademark because of non-use, the Supreme Court has followed the line taken by the European Court of Justice in Haupl/Lidl. As a result, a valid reason for non-use will be assumed more easily than under the former Benelux case law. read more

The Use of Ad Words When Selling Trademark Products on the Internet
On 9 January 2008 the Court of The Hague passed judgment in a case regarding Ad Words. The central question in this case concerned the extent to which it is allowed to use the trademark of another party in an Ad Word, which is used in search engines to call up an ad. In general this concerns the use of a third-party trademark for advertising purposes. read more

MEDIA


Press Law: Dutch Supreme Court Sets New Standards

The discussion about the liquidation of Oettinger, a jew in hiding, by movie maker Van Gasteren in 1943 has led to a second important press law judgment of the Dutch Supreme Court. After the Supreme Court ruling of 1995, in which a publication in newspaper Het Parool on the role of Van Gasteren was considered unlawful, in this instance the Supreme Court found that the online "open letter" on the subject of journalist Pamela Hemelrijk was a lawful publication. The Supreme Court has made a number of fundamental statements. read more

New Directive on Audiovisual Media Services

At the end of 2009 the successor of the Television Directive will have to be implemented in the Netherlands. The classic channels will profit from this, because the advertising rules will be relaxed. As a result, providers of on demand services will have to comply with more rules in the near future. read more

PERSONAL DATA PRIVACY


Sending Spam to Legal Persons Now Also Prohibited

Until recently, the mere sending of 'SPAM' to natural persons was prohibited. On 22 January 2008 the amendment of the Telecommunications Act (Telecommunicatiewet ("TW")) was realized. As a result of this amendment, sending SPAM to legal persons is also prohibited. What are the consequences for practice? read more

Promusicae versus Privacy: Right of Providers to Remain Silent Relying on Privacy Is Possible

On 29 January 2008 the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") decided that Member States do not have to include a provision into their national law under which ISPs are obliged to disclose name and address details to organizations managing collective rights. The judgment emphasizes the importance of the protection of privacy of natural persons. read more

REAL PROPERTY AND CONSTRUCTION

Termination of Rental Agreement Because of Abuse of Caretaker of Apartment by Tenant's Son?
A tenant is liable towards his landlord for his own behavior as well as for the behavior of third parties who use the rented property with his consent. This provision is an elaboration of the tenant's obligation to use the rented property as a good tenant. The judgment of the Dutch Supreme Court which is discussed below relates to the question of whether the assault of the caretaker of an apartment by the son of a tenant living with her constitutes a failure that justifies the termination of the rental agreement. read more

Share this:   
linkedin facebook twitter email

Should you not wish to receive this newsletter, or if you have a question or would like more information, please send an e-mail to info@kvdl.nl.

View our profile

linkedin