Search

Newsletter

Concept of ‘Working for the Undertaking’ of the WOR

Court of Amsterdam (Subdistrict section, Court in preliminary relief proceedings), 1 March 2010, JAR 2010/94

In Section 12 of the Works Councils Act (Wet op de Ondernemingsraden ('WOR')) it is stipulated that the membership of the Works Council ceases by law when this member ceases to work for the undertaking. When someone is or is not regarded as 'working for the undertaking' is defined in Section 1 of the WOR. Subsection 2 of this Section stipulates that this means: 'persons who work for the undertaking who have been appointed under public law or under a contract of employment entered into with an employer who operates an undertaking'. It appears from legislative history that two criteria must be met in order to fall under the scope of Section 1, Subsection 2 of the WOR: a legal and a factual criterion. The first, legal criterion means that only a person who works for the undertaking (on the basis of a contract of employment or appointed under public law) meets the definition. The factual criterion means that in addition the employee must actually be working for the undertaking.

Dispute

The fact that (the interpretation of) the above-mentioned definition is not entirely clear, appears from the fact that this is regularly under discussion. Is a Works Council member actually still working for the undertaking if he or she takes leave for more than a year and next leaves the employment?

Recently, the Court of Amsterdam, Subdistrict section, expressed an opinion on this question. In this case an employee had made use of the early retirement scheme. Prior to the retirement the employee took leave of more than one year. The employer took the position that the employee could not perform any work as a member of the Works Council anymore, since - also in view of the fact that he would subsequently leave the employment - he was no part anymore of the daily course of affairs within the company and also could not maintain any ties with the employees anymore. In the opinion of the employer, as of the start date of his leave the member of the Works Council was therefore de facto not working for the undertaking anymore. The Works Council had a different opinion and claimed before the Subdistrict Court that the employer would be obliged to enable the employee to perform his work as a member of the Works Council.

Judgment of the Subdistrict Court

The Subdistrict Court first determined that Section 12, Subsection 3 of the WOR prescribes that when a member of the Works Council ceases to work for the undertaking, his membership of the Works Council ceases by law. The dispute therefore revolved around the question what 'working for the undertaking' should mean.

In the event of relatively short interruptions, such as sickness and holidays, an employee remains working for the undertaking. The Subdistrict Court was of the opinion that due to the fact that incapacity for work may continue for a period of two years, this period should be taken as a maximum starting point when assessing whether an interruption is a 'short' interruption. The leave of the employee of more than a year is, in the opinion of the Subdistrict Court, not such that he is not working for the undertaking anymore. According to the Subdistrict Court, the fact that the employee will not return after his leave, does not alter this.

The Subdistrict Court held that the fact that the employee will not be involved in the course of affairs within the undertaking anymore and the decisions which the Works Council has to assess do not concern him anymore, do not lead to another judgment. The claim of the Works Council was allowed.

Tips:
  • On the basis of this judgment the maximum period of incapacity for work during the employment, i.e. two years, must be taken as a standard for the answer to the question of whether there is a 'short' interruption;
  • If you suspect that this situation might happen, you should make prior, clear, individual arrangements about the exercise of co-governance rights during interruptions and (long-term) leave of a member of the Works Council.
Share this:   
linkedin facebook twitter email
Marjolein Westerbeek

Tel: +31 20 5506 686
E-mail: marjolein.westerbeek@kvdl.nl

View our profile

linkedin