Search

Newsletter

Right to Information in Advisory Procedure

A discussion of the ruling of the Enterprise Section of 30 December 2008, ARO: 2009/13


Right to Information

In Section 31 subsection 1 of the Dutch Works Councils Act (Wet op de ondernemingsraden, "WOR"), the right of the Works Council to information is related to the duties it has to perform. The Works Council always has to state concretely for the purpose of which duty or advice it wishes to receive certain information. The employer is obliged to provide the information requested as soon as possible.

The Facts
The employer has two branches: one in Amersfoort and one in Amsterdam. Already in 2004 and 2006 the employer had considered joining the branches and relocating the Amersfoort branch to Amsterdam. However, this plan was not carried through. In April 2008 the employer requested the Works Council's advice about the intention to close the Amersfoort branch and to relocate all activities to Amsterdam before 31 December 2008. The Works Council found the request for advice too sketchy and asked the employer for more information in May 2008. After the Works Council had further specified the information it desired, the employer gave an extensive answer to the questions in a letter dated 27 June 2008. On the basis of that information the Works Council rendered a negative advice, with the argument that, in its opinion, the cost savings would turn out higher if the Amersfoort branch would remain open until the lease term agreed would have expired. According to the Works Council, the small financial advantage of an earlier closure was not proportionate to the consequences such a closure would entail for the employees. In addition, the Works Council stated that the Social Plan of which a draft was drawn up offered the employees insufficient compensation for the consequences of the relocation. On 8 September 2008 the employer decided - despite the negative advice of the Works Council - to go ahead with the relocation as of 31 December 2008. The Works Council disagreed with this decision and lodged an appeal, with the argument that the employer had paid insufficient heed to the consequences of the decision for the employees, and had not given a substantial reaction to the alternative.

Opinion of the Enterprise Section

The Enterprise Section shared the opinion of the Works Council that the request for advice was sketchy. However, the employer did provide sufficient information later on. Therefore this failure was not of such nature as to cause the decision to be manifestly unreasonable. Moreover, the Works Council itself said in its advice to the employer that 'with this it has (got) the opportunity to form a substantial opinion'. Furthermore, the Enterprise Section looked at the contents of the draft social plan and studied the way it came into being. The Enterprise Section was of the view that in the talks about the social plan the employer has carefully paid heed to the interests of the employees for whom the relocation will have consequences. The Enterprise Section also took into account that the social plan was discussed - with the approval of the Works Council - not with the Works Council but with the trade unions, and that there is no evidence of any objections brought forward by the trade unions. Furthermore, the employer has declared on several occasions that jobs would be preserved. The Works Council has failed to make plausible that this promise will not be fulfilled. Finally, the Enterprise Section thought that the employer had devoted sufficient attention to the alternative plan that was proposed by the Works Council. As a consequence, the Enterprise Section held that the decision was not manifestly unreasonable, and it denied the request of the Works Council.

Tips

• For employers: if you submit an (all too) sketchy request for advice, be aware of the fact that you may repair this by providing further information at the request of the Works Council.
• For Works Councils: if you think that the information you have received from the employer is too scarce to enable you to give a sound advice, you may request additional information from the employer at all times. Be sure always to indicate specifically what information you wish to receive and the reasons why. The responsibility to determine what information you need in order to give advice lies first and foremost with the Works Council, not with the employer.
• Only give your advice as a Works Council if you are sure you have received sufficient information as allows you to give advice. Once you have given your advice, you may no longer complain to the Enterprise Section afterwards that you had not received sufficient information from the employer to give a sound advice.

Share this:   
linkedin facebook twitter email
Dénise van Dongen

Tel: +31 20 5506 689
E-mail: denise.van.dongen@kvdl.nl

View our profile

linkedin